-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unblind energy sidebands in cs1 #218
Conversation
Since my default is to unblind everything that has potential signal at once (and no strong requests to unblind high-E)
👍 (I can't approve since I created) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Technically, good. Requires @pdeperio to merge I'd say, so nobody else please.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I made a commit as well, so technically I shouldn't merge too lol. But don't merge yet, I will use this branch locally.
What do we do if we see 10 events in 70-80 PE range? |
We are just doing |
good, I didn't realize this new change. So 70-80 is not nessary at all. Since this region won't be analyzed directly, do you think we can cut this if background model can not explain there at all? In my opinion it's ok as long as we don't cut anything below 70. |
not necessary anymore PR #216 |
Once we're ready this should open up cs1<3 pe as well as 70<=cs1<80 pe. Unblinding low and high energy sidebands for WIMP search.
It's very debatable whether the high energy sideband is needed at all and I can't really think of a justification at the moment so we should discuss.