New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FDC uses corrected position #1254
Conversation
It's 043256 with the master branch of straxen and global_v12 correction https://github.com/XENONnT/corrections/pull/219 |
So can we explain the difference of |
Do you want to do a test by yourself? Corrections and versions in my folder are changing rapidly, I cannot promise I didn't make any stupid mistake in checking. |
Using environment:
and code
|
And I do not think you should use |
Yes indeed there is some change... Maybe due to interpolation errors. We don't have to use |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Then please check a bit. :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey I did some checks and it looks good to me.
Professional! |
See https://xe1t-wiki.lngs.infn.it/doku.php?id=xenon:xenonnt:analysis:signals_and_detector:20230815:fdc, now straxen uses original positions for the FDC correction but the map is developed for z_dv_corr.
Note that the SR0 result won't be affected as the z_bias_map in SR0 is a dummy map so z_corr=0.
I also delete some fields that don't make sense to me.