New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
xpra subcommands should assume current instance where possible #3371
Comments
Done in the commit above for most subcommands: |
I noticed that |
Yes, we use positional arguments so it can't be removed completely but you can use an empty placeholder. |
When
xpra
is run from an xpra-driven window, it should be reasonable to assume that the server in question is $DISPLAY, yes? Is there a good reason not to default to $DISPLAY?Many subcommands could assume this, like
xpra screenshot xyz.png
. Perhaps something more precise and xpra-specific than $DISPLAY is in order, like maybeXPRA_SERVER_SOCKET
.When there's a genuine ambiguity, notably when no $DISPLAY exists, sure, xpra should ask for specifics.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: