Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

3DMatch Dataset - Wrong Mathces #15

Open
yuvalH9 opened this issue Dec 16, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

3DMatch Dataset - Wrong Mathces #15

yuvalH9 opened this issue Dec 16, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@yuvalH9
Copy link

yuvalH9 commented Dec 16, 2021

Hi,
I was wondering if you validated the correspondences between src and tgt over the trainset.
If I understand correctly, the point clouds given in the .pkl files are already aligned and the correspondences are for the aligned point clouds given as an ordered list.

I tried to visualize myself some random corresponding points and it seems that the points are not matches at all.

I attached an example for the first matching pair (visualized by Matlab) with 10 random matches

@XuyangBai
Copy link
Owner

Hi, I didn't see the example. Could you specify which point clouds pair you are using so that I can see it on my environment

@yuvalH9
Copy link
Author

yuvalH9 commented Jan 6, 2022

Hi @XuyangBai ,
I had a visualization problem and after fixing that the correspondence seems to be correct.

By the way, if I want to create my own GT correspondence for the train and validation dataset, how can I do that?
Maybe you can upload the GT transformations for the train and validation datasets (similar to the format of the test dataset) so we can create our own GT correspondence?

Thanks!
Yuval

@XuyangBai
Copy link
Owner

Hi, You can download the raw dataset and run https://github.com/XuyangBai/PPF-FoldNet/blob/master/script/fuse_fragments_3DMatch.py to compute the point clouds and the corresponding poses, from which you can compute the GT transformations.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants