Scale to run on two nodes #118
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
solsson
added a commit
to Yolean/kubeadm-vagrant
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 8, 2018
solsson
force-pushed
the
scale-2
branch
2 times, most recently
from
1e32388
to
5c86481
Compare
|
#253 will replace this concept, and thus the endless rebases |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For a bare metal backup cluster experiment, based on https://github.com/Yolean/kubeadm-vagrant.
Will be interesting to keep responsive at single node downtime, with respect to zookeeper quorums in particular. See #26 (comment) and #70 (comment) for history on that.
Will rebase #44 on this one, as it's scaled down further. Would be interesting to experiment with #112 here.