Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade to upstream version 0.12.0 #16

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

JimboJoe
Copy link

@JimboJoe JimboJoe commented Jul 23, 2017

Problem

Upgrade to new Searx 0.12.0

Solution

Update upstream archive reference and adapt setting file.

PR Status

Work finished. Package_check, basic tests and upgrade from last version OK.
Could be reviewed and tested.

Validation

  • [ ] Principle agreement 0/2 :
  • [ ] Quick review 0/1 :
  • [ ] Simple test 0/1 :
  • [ ] Deep review 0/1 :
  • [ ] Complex test 0/0

  • Complete test :
  • Upgrade previous version :
  • Code review : Maniack C
  • Approval (LGTM) : Maniack C
  • Approval (LGTM) : frju365
  • CI succeeded : Maniack C

Since this PR has been rerouted from master to testing. It passes to a minor decision.

  • Upgrade previous version :
  • Code review : Maniack C
  • Approval (LGTM) : Maniack C
  • Approval (LGTM) : frju365
  • CI succeeded : Maniack C
  • CI succeeded : Build Status
    When the PR is mark as ready to merge, you have to wait for 3 days before really merge it.

@maniackcrudelis
Copy link

Just 2 questions:

  • Why just me !?
  • And, why do you want to review this PR on the official list instead of here. (just a question, because why not...)

Anyway, I like your template for this PR. Maybe it's can be our official template. We need one, by the way...

So, I tried a "real" install on my VM, it works fine.
And all the tests with Package check are good.

@JimboJoe
Copy link
Author

As discussed on XMPP, it seems better to apply the complete process in the apps themselves, and then merge quickly the PR on official/community.json. So let's move on!

@maniackcrudelis
Copy link

If you don't mind, I slightlied change your the validation points. It seems more specific to the apps.
Reverse my changes if you don't agree with me.

@JimboJoe JimboJoe requested a review from frju365 July 28, 2017 15:42
@maniackcrudelis maniackcrudelis changed the base branch from master to testing September 9, 2017 13:57
@JimboJoe
Copy link
Author

Obsoleted by #21

@JimboJoe JimboJoe closed this Nov 30, 2017
@maniackcrudelis maniackcrudelis deleted the enh_searx_0.12.0 branch April 13, 2018 15:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants