Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can't remove association from expert command if device already excluded #263

Open
aivs opened this issue Aug 6, 2017 · 4 comments
Open
Labels

Comments

@aivs
Copy link
Contributor

aivs commented Aug 6, 2017

Associations not presented
2017-08-06 19 54 35

In this list need a device_13
2017-08-06 19 53 09

@vades
Copy link
Contributor

vades commented Aug 8, 2017

From where we can get this device? The sdropdown with nodes is build fom devices in the data holder and if device is already excluded disappear from the data holder.
IMHO the better solution is: After device exclusion automatically remove all assoc with this device.

@PoltoS
Copy link
Member

PoltoS commented Aug 8, 2017

It is of course a good idea to exclude, but if it was not done - what's next? We need to add a text field to still allow it. Another solution is to build the list from devices + the list of nodes in the group.

@vades
Copy link
Contributor

vades commented Aug 9, 2017

The dropdown is shown because in the pyzw_zwave_ui.js in the saction
case 0x8e (MutiChannelAssociation) > Remove > "label": "Node" is type set as "node"
I've changed it as in "case 0x85: (Association)"" to
"label": "Node",
"type": {
"range": {
"min": 1,
"max": 255
}
}
bug-assoc

@vades vades added the testme label Aug 10, 2017
@aivs
Copy link
Contributor Author

aivs commented Sep 1, 2017

Ok, from expert UI now I can remove association
2017-09-01 16 58 28
But on Association tab associations list still disappearing.
2017-09-01 16 58 37

We know about associations, what the problem to show them?
2017-09-01 17 03 39

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants