Bruteforce throttling vulnerability #151
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Using HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR in the key is useless because the client can set a random X-Forwarded-For and bypass throttling.
Secondly using email in the key is useless too because there is little chance the same IP needs to access multiples accounts and have lost its passwords for all its accounts.
The rare case when one IP need to access multiple accounts is when it's behind a reverse proxy. In this case the 'HTTP_X_FORWARDED_FOR' should be used if it's properly set by the reverse proxy and not overridable.
Most of the time web application aren't behind reverse proxy so it's safe to only check REMOTE_ADDR