Replies: 3 comments
-
Verdant implementationPros: Possibly opens the door to more flexible authorization in the future. Cons: Complicates Verdant as a system, even if only a little. Also, I've thought about possible future authorization steps and none of them seem feasible with the way Verdant works (like sharing to N users, or read/write permission granularity). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Multi-library implementationPros: Keeps Verdant simple and isolates this concern to higher abstraction. Private libraries would be relatively lightweight as they would be limited to pull-based sync anyways. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Upon reflection, I think what I'll try is prototyping a simple app with private data using the multi-library approach and see how it feels. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have a couple routes for supporting documents which are private to one user, which would be helpful for certain upcoming apps, like...
All of these are either a whole library or some subset of documents being private to one particular user's replicas. They should still sync to that user's devices.
The two ways I have for doing this would be...
So I just want a space to (publicly) think out which one to choose.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions