Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test montecarlo shapley with Random forests and GBM models #49

Closed
Tracked by #28
Xuzzo opened this issue Jun 2, 2022 · 0 comments
Closed
Tracked by #28

Test montecarlo shapley with Random forests and GBM models #49

Xuzzo opened this issue Jun 2, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
testing Writing and verifying tests (unit or otherwise) theory Things to investigate with pen and paper

Comments

@Xuzzo
Copy link
Collaborator

Xuzzo commented Jun 2, 2022

The repository is built to support tabular data and hence tree based methods. However, some parts of it were built with the implicit assumption of deterministic training (e.g. linear fit), which is not the case for random forests and gradient boosting machines.
Before moving on (e.g. working on truncated montecarlo or adjusting our cache to the non-deterministic case) we should analyse the drawbacks of evaluating a non-deterministic model on our (implicitly deterministic) code.

@Xuzzo Xuzzo added testing Writing and verifying tests (unit or otherwise) theory Things to investigate with pen and paper labels Jun 2, 2022
@Xuzzo Xuzzo self-assigned this Jun 2, 2022
@Xuzzo Xuzzo mentioned this issue Jun 2, 2022
5 tasks
@Xuzzo Xuzzo closed this as completed Jun 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
testing Writing and verifying tests (unit or otherwise) theory Things to investigate with pen and paper
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant