Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update section on authorization code binding #59

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 26, 2024
Merged

Conversation

PieterKas
Copy link
Collaborator

Proposed update based on feedback in issue #47

Open question for reviewers (and @bc_pi) whether we should allow both or only a single method, and if a single methods should we opt for the least common denominator (dpop_jkt) or an authorization challenge endpoint specific one?

Proposed update based on feedback in issue #47 

Open question for reviewers (and @bc_pi) whether we should allow both or only a single method, and if a single methods should we opt for the least common denominator  (dpop_jkt) or an authorization challenge endpoint specific one?
@bc-pi
Copy link

bc-pi commented Feb 20, 2024

Commented over in #47 that I think the single method of the DPoP proof header is sufficient and preferred.

@aaronpk
Copy link
Owner

aaronpk commented Feb 23, 2024

I would tend to agree that we should stick with only the header option for DPoP.

@PieterKas
Copy link
Collaborator Author

PieterKas commented Feb 23, 2024 via email

@PieterKas
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@bc-pi and @aaronpk, I made the changes. please review and feel free to merge if ready.

Copy link

@bc-pi bc-pi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks okay to me (pending conflicts that need to be resolved)

draft-parecki-oauth-first-party-apps.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@aaronpk aaronpk merged commit 6f71cb4 into main Feb 26, 2024
2 checks passed
@aaronpk aaronpk deleted the PieterKas-patch-3 branch February 26, 2024 21:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants