Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rsc1 api constructor #16

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 6, 2015

Conversation

aericson
Copy link
Contributor

@aericson aericson commented Aug 3, 2015

(RSC1) The constructor accepts either an API key, a token string, or a set of ClientOptions. An exception is raised if invalid arguments are provided such as no API key, token and no means to create a token.

@fjsj fjsj closed this Aug 4, 2015
@fjsj fjsj reopened this Aug 4, 2015
@fjsj
Copy link
Contributor

fjsj commented Aug 5, 2015

@mattheworiordan please take a look at this PR too

@aericson
Copy link
Contributor Author

aericson commented Aug 5, 2015

@mattheworiordan: updated. Can you take another look?

I have rebased to update code from fjsj's last PR, your past comments wont show here.

You can find them here if you need: vintasoftware@1e1eae2#comments

self.assertEqual(ably.options.key_name, test_vars["keys"][0]["key_name"],
"Key id does not match")
self.assertEqual(ably.options.key_secret, test_vars["keys"][0]["key_secret"],
"Key value does not match")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will merge, and not that important really, but the test text still refers to key id and key value

mattheworiordan added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2015
@mattheworiordan mattheworiordan merged commit 795c0e8 into ably:master Aug 6, 2015
@aericson aericson deleted the rsc1-api-constructor branch August 27, 2015 19:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants