Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Define key terms and definitions in a contract/clause #124

Open
algomaster99 opened this issue Mar 30, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Define key terms and definitions in a contract/clause #124

algomaster99 opened this issue Mar 30, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@algomaster99
Copy link
Member

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
It would be great if we could add a data type whose function will be to define the key terms or definition used throughout the contract. An example of such terms:
Screenshot from 2020-03-31 04-45-09

Describe the solution you'd like
We can add a data type which shall define these terms.

Describe alternatives you've considered
I am although not sure if this should be a data type or we can just place it at the beginning of the contract (it exists in the beginning usually) and parse it using cicero.

@jeromesimeon
Copy link
Member

This is an interesting issue. I'm not sure how I missed it. I'm a little unclear if this should be:

  • A Concerto or a Cicero issue?
  • A new base type or a complex type with specific handling in the AP templates

@algomaster99
Copy link
Member Author

@jeromesimeon I think we will first have to create a data type for this which I guess makes it a concerto issue. Then we can handle the parsing in cicero.

@dselman
Copy link
Contributor

dselman commented Jul 2, 2020

What functionality would you expect this to have? E.g. within the Contract Editor.

@jeromesimeon
Copy link
Member

Whatever this is, I feel this is mostly related to the models library. We do already have "base" types for requests/responses/obligations/contract state etc. Not sure we need more. Users can define their own kinds of obligations that might be more specific.

Am I missing something?

@jeromesimeon jeromesimeon transferred this issue from accordproject/concerto Mar 14, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants