Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Symmetric contractions which are element-dependent vs. not #37

Closed
chaitjo opened this issue Oct 31, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Symmetric contractions which are element-dependent vs. not #37

chaitjo opened this issue Oct 31, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@chaitjo
Copy link
Contributor

chaitjo commented Oct 31, 2022

class SymmetricContraction(CodeGenMixin, torch.nn.Module):

In the symmetric contraction block, which implements Eq. 10 and 11 from the MACE paper, one of the key hyperparams is element_dependent which is by default set to True.

Based on my understanding, if we set this param to True, the contraction step will additionally consider the node_attrs (https://github.com/ACEsuit/mace/blob/main/mace/modules/blocks.py#L127) which are passed as the optional input y (https://github.com/ACEsuit/mace/blob/main/mace/modules/symmetric_contraction.py#L150).

My questions are:

  • Does the paper's Eq. 10 describe the element dependent or non-dependent version of the symmetric contraction?
  • Assuming that the initial node feature node_feat in the overall model (https://github.com/ACEsuit/mace/blob/main/mace/modules/models.py#L148) would already be incorporating information about the element type, why do we need the element dependent symmetric contraction?
@chaitjo
Copy link
Contributor Author

chaitjo commented Oct 31, 2022

Moved to discussions instead: #38

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant