Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What to do with multiple outcomes? #2

Open
acoppock opened this issue Jul 8, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

What to do with multiple outcomes? #2

acoppock opened this issue Jul 8, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@acoppock
Copy link
Owner

acoppock commented Jul 8, 2015

There's a couple of things I'd like to have a default on:

  1. Some say you have to report all measured outcome variables. This is hard in some cases
  2. Some say you should make a scale. What's the best all-purpose way to make a scale. We've been doing principal components, but there must be tradeoffs to doing that.
  3. What about multiple comparisons?
@dbroockman
Copy link

Consider NPC?

@acoppock
Copy link
Owner Author

What's NPC?

@dbroockman
Copy link

http://caughey.mit.edu/sites/default/files/documents/NPC141120.pdf

I think factor analysis would be better though. Probably higher power.

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Alexander Coppock <notifications@github.com

wrote:

What's NPC?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#2 (comment)
.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants