Fix object reference count problem on error path in AcpiExOpcode_1A_0T_1R #685
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…T_1R Prevent an unwarranted AcpiUtRemoveReference on an attached object in AcpiExOpcode_1A_0T_1R when AcpiExReadDataFromField returns an error. The extra decrement of the object's reference count results in the premature deletion of that object while it is still attached. Any subsequent reference to that attached object becomes a use-after- free and can result in an OS crash. One real world example of how this error path can be encountered is on evaluation of RefOf() a local region field where there is no registered handler for that OpRegion. Signed-off-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com>
rafaeljw
reviewed
Oct 14, 2021
| @@ -1193,6 +1193,7 @@ AcpiExOpcode_1A_0T_1R ( | |||
| WalkState, ReturnDesc, &TempDesc); | |||
| if (ACPI_FAILURE (Status)) | |||
| { | |||
| ReturnDesc = NULL; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The status could be returned from here right away instead of doing the extra assignment.
rafaeljw
added a commit
to rafaeljw/acpica
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 10, 2021
If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, AcpiExOpcode_1A_0T_1R () calls AcpiNsGetAttachedObject () to obtain ReturnDesc which may require additional resolution with the help of AcpiExReadDataFromField (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original ReturnDesc is decremented which is incorrect, because AcpiNsGetAttachedObject () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of RefOf() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making AcpiExOpcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a AcpiExReadDataFromField () failure. Link: acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
This can be closed now as #732 got merged. |
|
#732 was merged, closing. |
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 29, 2021
…_1R() ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2022
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f9 ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2022
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f9 ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2022
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f9 ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2022
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f9 ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2022
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f9 ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2022
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f9 ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2022
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f9 ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2022
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f9 ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2022
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f9 ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2022
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f9 ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2022
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f9 ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2022
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f9 ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2022
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f9 ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2022
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f9 ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2022
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f9 ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2022
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f9 ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2022
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f9 ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2022
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f9 ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2022
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f9 ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2022
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f9 ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2022
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f9 ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-block
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2022
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f9 ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
vulkan-ops
pushed a commit
to vulkan-ops/kernel_motorola_sdm632
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 15, 2022
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
vulkan-ops
pushed a commit
to vulkan-ops/kernel_motorola_sdm632
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 15, 2022
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ev-gerrit
pushed a commit
to Evervolv/android_kernel_moto_sdm632
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 4, 2022
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
iqba78
pushed a commit
to iqba78/android_kernel_xiaomi_sdm660_southwest
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2022
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
iqba78
pushed a commit
to iqba78/android_kernel_xiaomi_sdm660_southwest
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 17, 2022
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
much-doge
pushed a commit
to much-doge/Quantum_Quackery
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 31, 2022
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Elchanz3
pushed a commit
to Elchanz3/android_kernel_samsung_exynos9820
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 8, 2023
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Wrdn28
pushed a commit
to Wrdn28/X01AD_Kernel
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 11, 2023
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Elchanz3
pushed a commit
to Elchanz3/android_kernel_samsung_exynos9820
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2023
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Elchanz3
pushed a commit
to kimboKTeam/android_kernel_samsung_exynos9820
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2023
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
bggRGjQaUbCoE
pushed a commit
to bggRGjQaUbCoE/android_kernel_samsung_sm8250-mohammad92
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 6, 2023
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Rem01Gaming
pushed a commit
to Rem01Gaming/liquid_kernel_realme_even
that referenced
this pull request
May 22, 2023
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
JoysKo
pushed a commit
to JoysKo/HYBRID_CAF_kernel
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2023
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
JoysKo
pushed a commit
to JoysKo/HYBRID_CAF_kernel
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 30, 2023
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
intersectRaven
pushed a commit
to intersectRaven/rk356x-kernel
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 16, 2023
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
diphons
pushed a commit
to diphons/D8G_Kernel
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 17, 2023
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ishugrapher
pushed a commit
to ishugrapher/kernel_realme_RMX3031
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 19, 2023
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ishugrapher
pushed a commit
to ishugrapher/kernel_realme_RMX3031
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 20, 2023
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
zahid5656
pushed a commit
to zahid5656/android_kernel_realme_sm8150
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 12, 2023
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
ratatouille100
pushed a commit
to ratatouille100/kernel_samsung_universal9611
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 19, 2023
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Rem01Gaming
pushed a commit
to Rem01Gaming/liquid_kernel_realme_even
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2024
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
roniwae
pushed a commit
to roniwae/MiuiKernel
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2024
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Dheeraj3031A
pushed a commit
to Dheeraj3031A/kernel_oplus_RMX3461
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2024
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
backslashxx
pushed a commit
to backslashxx/android_karnol_ximi_fog
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 14, 2024
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
kevios12
pushed a commit
to kevios12/android_kernel_samsung_universal7885
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2024
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
RT1648
pushed a commit
to RT1648/android_kernel_asus_sdm660
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2024
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
FlorinelulX
pushed a commit
to FlorinelulX/android_kernel_huawei_hi6250-8
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2024
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
kevios12
pushed a commit
to kevios12/android_kernel_samsung_universal7885
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 24, 2024
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Notganesh
pushed a commit
to Notganesh/kernel_oneplus_ivan-R
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2024
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Huawei-Dev
pushed a commit
to Huawei-Dev/android_kernel_huawei_hi3660
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 13, 2024
…_1R() [ Upstream commit 24ea5f90ec9548044a6209685c5010edd66ffe8f ] ACPICA commit d984f12041392fa4156b52e2f7e5c5e7bc38ad9e If Operand[0] is a reference of the ACPI_REFCLASS_REFOF class, acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () calls acpi_ns_get_attached_object () to obtain return_desc which may require additional resolution with the help of acpi_ex_read_data_from_field (). If the latter fails, the reference counter of the original return_desc is decremented which is incorrect, because acpi_ns_get_attached_object () does not increment the reference counter of the object returned by it. This issue may lead to premature deletion of the attached object while it is still attached and a use-after-free and crash in the host OS. For example, this may happen when on evaluation of ref_of() a local region field where there is no registered handler for the given Operation Region. Fix it by making acpi_ex_opcode_1A_0T_1R () return Status right away after a acpi_ex_read_data_from_field () failure. Link: acpica/acpica@d984f120 Link: acpica/acpica#685 Reported-by: Lenny Szubowicz <lszubowi@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Prevent an unwarranted AcpiUtRemoveReference on an attached object
in AcpiExOpcode_1A_0T_1R when AcpiExReadDataFromField returns an
error. The extra decrement of the object's reference count results
in the premature deletion of that object while it is still attached.
Any subsequent reference to that attached object becomes a use-after-
free and can result in an OS crash.
One real world example of how this error path can be encountered is
on evaluation of RefOf() a local region field where there is no
registered handler for that OpRegion.
Signed-off-by: Lenny Szubowicz lszubowi@redhat.com