Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Non-determinism in ACSL #15

Open
vprevosto opened this issue Nov 16, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

Non-determinism in ACSL #15

vprevosto opened this issue Nov 16, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@vprevosto
Copy link
Member

Is there a need for a non-deterministic constructor such as \any T x; P(x)?

@pbaudin
Copy link
Contributor

pbaudin commented Mar 9, 2018

The construct \any T x ; P(x) is similar to let x of type T such that P(x) in x.

As far as I can remember, the answer was definitely no because this construct is not part of the first order logic. We wanted to have t==t being true for any term t. That may not be the case for the equality ( \any T x; P(x)) == ( \any T x; P(x)).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants