Should implementation descriptions be required?

[WilcoFiers]

The ACT Task Force is getting stricter about what counts as an implementation. For each rule, they require at least complete implementation without "cantTell" results. Additionally, they need to know that the implementor, if manual input was involved in creating the implementation data, that this was done with a predefined test procedure, and if used in a tool, that this test procedure is part of the tool.

A while back we added the possibility to add a description to an implementation. This might have gone a little underappreciated, since only axe-core has one today:
https://github.com/act-rules/act-rules-web/blob/develop/implementations.yml#L14

For transparency, i think it would be helpful for each implementor to provide such a statement.

[WilcoFiers]

Decided in the group that yes, we should get implementation descriptions. It is on my todo list to sort that out for existing implementations.