[small] Update/2.0/hub cloud test

[verbose-void]

made test go accross 2 chunks and cleaned it up a little bit

[verbose-void]

will be updating fixtures soon

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1023 (3d90563) into main (fa8e734) will decrease coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1023      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.66%   88.62%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          85       85              
  Lines        3918     3920       +2     
==========================================
  Hits         3474     3474              
- Misses        444      446       +2     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
hub/api/tests/test_api.py	99.08% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
hub/api/dataset.py	87.23% <0.00%> (-1.42%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update fa8e734...3d90563. Read the comment docs.

[davidbuniat]

Would be great to switch to dev in order to avoid uploading bunch of test datasets to production.

Check this https://github.com/activeloopai/dataflow/blob/master/backend/api/tests/fixtures/datasetv2.py#L12

Instead you would need to have

hub.client.config.DEV = True
...

and activeloop credentials should for development (not production)

[davidbuniat]

Would be great to switch to dev in order to avoid uploading bunch of test datasets to production.

Check this https://github.com/activeloopai/dataflow/blob/master/backend/api/tests/fixtures/datasetv2.py#L12

Instead you would need to have

hub.client.config.DEV = True
...

and activeloop credentials should for development (not production)

It is fine to add a production read-only test.

[verbose-void]

@davidbuniat that's a good suggestion, but outside the scope of this PR. if there's nothing wrong with this PR let's get it approved

[davidbuniat]

@mccrearyd adding test datasets to the production is wrong :) then it would be hustle to clean up in backend if the upload fails (not only in storage)