-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 601
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[AL-1713] Dicom #1572
[AL-1713] Dicom #1572
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1572 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 92.47% 92.34% -0.13%
==========================================
Files 201 202 +1
Lines 18611 18612 +1
==========================================
- Hits 17210 17188 -22
- Misses 1401 1424 +23
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Few remarks and questions
- DICOM itself is a container who has multiple types of lossless compression methods currently under cover. What if the user is going to adjust?
- Do we apply any compression to the metadata in sample_info?
- Have you tried to train a model on dicom file? (the exercise of doing it will help to truly understand user experience)
Other than that overall looked good to me.
|
🚀 🚀 Pull Request
Checklist:
coverage-rate
upChanges