Migrating to actix-web 2.0

[alfonso-eusebio]

Hi @svartalf,

I was using this crate on a personal project that I'm trying to move to actix-web 2.0. Since I didn't want to reinvent the wheel (and probably don't have enough experience) I thought I'd try to migrate actix-web-httpauth to the new version.

After much trial and error I managed to get something that compiles (huge milestone for me), and it actually even works when used inside my (very basic) project!
(Note: The stress is in "trial and error"; you won't necessarily find best practices applied here.)

I didn't migrate the tests, and my project only uses Basic auth (not Bearer), so there might be issues lurking in there. In any case, I wanted to check if this initial "migration" would be of interest to you in order to kick-start the next "official" version of actix-web-httpauth, compatible with actix-web 2.0.

You can see my changes in this branch. If you think it's worth progressing, I could spend some more time on the tests and then create a PR.

Cheers,
Alfonso

[nishtahir]

@alfonso-eusebio I'm using this on a personal project as well and also migrating to 2.0. I'm not a maintainer on the project but just wanted to mention that the work you are doing could benefit the community as well 😄

[alfonso-eusebio]

Thanks @nishtahir,

Feel free to use the version from my branch mentioned above. It's not as simple as adding a crate dependency but if you clone/download the repo and configure the local path for the dependency it should work.

Since @fafhrd91 has just released version 2.0.0 of actix-web I thought it'd be a good opportunity to upgrade the version in my branch and make sure that cargo test runs and completes in my migrated code. I just committed the update.

Let's see if at some point we can get this (or a different/improved version) into the main repo and the crate.

[nishtahir]

@alfonso-eusebio Thanks for your work on this 🎉

[JohnTitor]

Fixed by #14, I'm going to close this. Thanks for the report!