Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: Decouple LCG and Ubuntu builds #1222

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Apr 28, 2022

Conversation

paulgessinger
Copy link
Member

This allows getting rid of some if/else branching between these, and allows splitting up the follow up checks (examples+pytest and phys monitoring) into separate jobs that depend on the build job result. This means they can run independently of each other and if either fails, the other will still run and provide output.

@paulgessinger paulgessinger added this to the next milestone Mar 31, 2022
@paulgessinger
Copy link
Member Author

/cc @stephenswat

Copy link
Member

@stephenswat stephenswat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As far as I can tell this is a great way to split up the existing job into four parts, looks great!

@stephenswat stephenswat added the Infrastructure Changes to build tools, continous integration, ... label Mar 31, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 31, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #1222 (c6b39d8) into main (53187e4) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1222   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   47.94%   47.94%           
=======================================
  Files         373      373           
  Lines       19495    19495           
  Branches     9152     9152           
=======================================
  Hits         9347     9347           
  Misses       3817     3817           
  Partials     6331     6331           

📣 Codecov can now indicate which changes are the most critical in Pull Requests. Learn more

@stephenswat
Copy link
Member

Hmm, so it looks like the CI is still trying to run the old jobs, which it now no longer has the configuration for anymore? Or how does that work?

@paulgessinger
Copy link
Member Author

"Required checks" in the PR UI is a UI thing, that's not defined by the job description. I'll have to override this and change the settings if we merge this.

@stephenswat
Copy link
Member

Ah, that seems... Confusing on Github's part. 🤔

@paulgessinger
Copy link
Member Author

Ok, fixed conflicts. Can we go again @stephenswat ?

paulgessinger added a commit to paulgessinger/acts that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2022
Based on acts-project#1222

With acts-project#1222 in, we can have the python level tests and the perf
monitoring fail independently of one another. This PR enables that
again. Also bumps `histcmp` to v0.4.0 for a fix for missing legends in
some plots, and to include standalone PDFs in addition to the HTML
report.
Copy link
Member

@stephenswat stephenswat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Re-approving.

@paulgessinger
Copy link
Member Author

Ok, required old checks are still listed, new ones have passed. Overriding check requirement to merge this then.

@paulgessinger paulgessinger merged commit 996267c into acts-project:main Apr 28, 2022
@paulgessinger paulgessinger deleted the ci/restructure branch April 28, 2022 13:38
kodiakhq bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 5, 2022
Based on #1222

With #1222 in, we can have the python level tests and the perf
monitoring fail independently of one another. This PR enables that
again. Also bumps `histcmp` to v0.4.0 for a fix for missing legends in
some plots, and to include standalone PDFs in addition to the HTML
report.
@paulgessinger paulgessinger modified the milestones: next, v19.0.0 May 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Infrastructure Changes to build tools, continous integration, ...
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants