Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: any direction for helical track linearizer #1363

Conversation

andiwand
Copy link
Contributor

@andiwand andiwand commented Aug 3, 2022

Previously the HelicalTrackLinearizer assumed that the vertex we are fitting has to be reachable by back propagation. This is not always the case. In this PR we try to estimate the direction in which we will find the vertex and use it for the propagation.

@asalzburger mentioned that it would be good to back propagate from the first measurement of the particle on the track as this will always be "ahead" of the vertex

cc @paulgessinger

@andiwand andiwand marked this pull request as ready for review August 3, 2022 09:42
@andiwand andiwand added the 🚧 WIP Work-in-progress label Aug 3, 2022
@andiwand andiwand added this to the WIP milestone Aug 3, 2022
@andiwand andiwand changed the title fix: Any direction for helical track linearizer fix: any direction for helical track linearizer Aug 3, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 3, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #1363 (6e0b46e) into main (f3d23e0) will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 50.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1363      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   47.83%   47.83%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         380      380              
  Lines       20149    20150       +1     
  Branches     9371     9373       +2     
==========================================
  Hits         9638     9638              
  Misses       4063     4063              
- Partials     6448     6449       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
.../include/Acts/Vertexing/HelicalTrackLinearizer.ipp 27.55% <50.00%> (-0.29%) ⬇️

📣 Codecov can now indicate which changes are the most critical in Pull Requests. Learn more

@andiwand andiwand removed the 🚧 WIP Work-in-progress label Aug 3, 2022
Copy link
Member

@paulgessinger paulgessinger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@paulgessinger paulgessinger added the backport develop/v19.x Backport this PR to the v19.x series label Aug 4, 2022
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 8639c37 into acts-project:main Aug 4, 2022
acts-project-service pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2022
Previously the `HelicalTrackLinearizer` assumed that the vertex we are fitting has to be reachable by back propagation. This is not always the case. In this PR we try to estimate the direction in which we will find the vertex and use it for the propagation.

@asalzburger mentioned that it would be good to back propagate from the first measurement of the particle on the track as this will always be "ahead" of the vertex

cc @paulgessinger

(cherry picked from commit 8639c37)
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the automerge label Aug 4, 2022
kodiakhq bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2022
…velop/v19.x] (#1377)

Backport 8639c37 from #1363.
---
Previously the `HelicalTrackLinearizer` assumed that the vertex we are fitting has to be reachable by back propagation. This is not always the case. In this PR we try to estimate the direction in which we will find the vertex and use it for the propagation.

@asalzburger mentioned that it would be good to back propagate from the first measurement of the particle on the track as this will always be "ahead" of the vertex

cc @paulgessinger
@andiwand andiwand deleted the fix-helical-track-linearizer-any-direction branch September 1, 2022 11:50
@acts-project-service
Copy link
Collaborator

The backport to develop/v9.1.x failed:

The process '/usr/bin/git' failed with exit code 1

To backport manually, run these commands in your terminal:

# Fetch latest updates from GitHub
git fetch
# Create a new working tree
git worktree add .worktrees/backport-develop/v9.1.x develop/v9.1.x
# Navigate to the new working tree
cd .worktrees/backport-develop/v9.1.x
# Create a new branch
git switch --create backport-1363-to-develop/v9.1.x
# Cherry-pick the merged commit of this pull request and resolve the conflicts
git cherry-pick -x --mainline 1 8639c37faff32a288e2417df0a7f099131132b35
# Push it to GitHub
git push --set-upstream origin backport-1363-to-develop/v9.1.x
# Go back to the original working tree
cd ../..
# Delete the working tree
git worktree remove .worktrees/backport-develop/v9.1.x

Then, create a pull request where the base branch is develop/v9.1.x and the compare/head branch is backport-1363-to-develop/v9.1.x.

paulgessinger pushed a commit to paulgessinger/acts that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2022
Previously the `HelicalTrackLinearizer` assumed that the vertex we are fitting has to be reachable by back propagation. This is not always the case. In this PR we try to estimate the direction in which we will find the vertex and use it for the propagation.

@asalzburger mentioned that it would be good to back propagate from the first measurement of the particle on the track as this will always be "ahead" of the vertex

cc @paulgessinger
paulgessinger pushed a commit to paulgessinger/acts that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2022
Previously the `HelicalTrackLinearizer` assumed that the vertex we are fitting has to be reachable by back propagation. This is not always the case. In this PR we try to estimate the direction in which we will find the vertex and use it for the propagation.
paulgessinger added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2022
…velop/v9.1.x] (#1498)

fix: any direction for helical track linearizer (#1363)

Previously the `HelicalTrackLinearizer` assumed that the vertex we are fitting has to be reachable by back propagation. This is not always the case. In this PR we try to estimate the direction in which we will find the vertex and use it for the propagation.

Co-authored-by: Andreas Stefl <stefl.andreas@gmail.com>
acts-project-service pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2022
Previously the `HelicalTrackLinearizer` assumed that the vertex we are fitting has to be reachable by back propagation. This is not always the case. In this PR we try to estimate the direction in which we will find the vertex and use it for the propagation.

@asalzburger mentioned that it would be good to back propagate from the first measurement of the particle on the track as this will always be "ahead" of the vertex

cc @paulgessinger

(cherry picked from commit 8639c37)
kodiakhq bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2022
…velop/v19.0.x] (#1499)

Backport 8639c37 from #1363.
---
Previously the `HelicalTrackLinearizer` assumed that the vertex we are fitting has to be reachable by back propagation. This is not always the case. In this PR we try to estimate the direction in which we will find the vertex and use it for the propagation.

@asalzburger mentioned that it would be good to back propagate from the first measurement of the particle on the track as this will always be "ahead" of the vertex

cc @paulgessinger
@paulgessinger paulgessinger modified the milestones: WIP, v20.0.0 Oct 3, 2022
@AJPfleger AJPfleger linked an issue May 22, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Vertexing produces propagation errors
3 participants