-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 157
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: maybe-uninitialized warning in SpacepointBuilder #1543
Merged
kodiakhq
merged 3 commits into
acts-project:main
from
benjaminhuth:fix/spacepoint-builder-maybe-uninitialized
Sep 23, 2022
Merged
fix: maybe-uninitialized warning in SpacepointBuilder #1543
kodiakhq
merged 3 commits into
acts-project:main
from
benjaminhuth:fix/spacepoint-builder-maybe-uninitialized
Sep 23, 2022
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
benjaminhuth
added
Bug
Something isn't working
Component - Core
Affects the Core module
Impact - Minor
Nuissance bug and/or affects only a single module
labels
Sep 21, 2022
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1543 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 48.47% 48.47%
=======================================
Files 381 381
Lines 20699 20699
Branches 9503 9503
=======================================
Hits 10034 10034
Misses 4112 4112
Partials 6553 6553
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
Thanks @benjaminhuth for fixing this. Looks good to me. |
toyamaza
approved these changes
Sep 22, 2022
paulgessinger
added
the
backport develop/v19.x
Backport this PR to the v19.x series
label
Sep 23, 2022
acts-project-service
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2022
My new GCC does emit a `-Wmaybe-uninitialized` warning in the `SpacePointBuilder.ipp`. Indeed, in the Error case (the `else` branch in the `buildSpacePoint` function) the values `gpos` and `gCov` seems to stay uninitialized. I'm not sure if zero initialization is actually the best thing to do here (maybe @toyamaza can comment on that), maybe return a `Result<void>` could also be an option? (cherry picked from commit f3b20f7)
paulgessinger
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2022
…to develop/v19.x] (#1553) My new GCC does emit a `-Wmaybe-uninitialized` warning in the `SpacePointBuilder.ipp`. Indeed, in the Error case (the `else` branch in the `buildSpacePoint` function) the values `gpos` and `gCov` seems to stay uninitialized. Co-authored-by: Benjamin Huth <37871400+benjaminhuth@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
backport develop/v19.x
Backport this PR to the v19.x series
Bug
Something isn't working
Component - Core
Affects the Core module
Impact - Minor
Nuissance bug and/or affects only a single module
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
My new GCC does emit a
-Wmaybe-uninitialized
warning in theSpacePointBuilder.ipp
. Indeed, in the Error case (theelse
branch in thebuildSpacePoint
function) the valuesgpos
andgCov
seems to stay uninitialized.I'm not sure if zero initialization is actually the best thing to do here (maybe @toyamaza can comment on that), maybe return a
Result<void>
could also be an option?