Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: maybe-uninitialized warning in SpacepointBuilder #1543

Conversation

benjaminhuth
Copy link
Member

My new GCC does emit a -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning in the SpacePointBuilder.ipp. Indeed, in the Error case (the else branch in the buildSpacePoint function) the values gpos and gCov seems to stay uninitialized.

I'm not sure if zero initialization is actually the best thing to do here (maybe @toyamaza can comment on that), maybe return a Result<void> could also be an option?

@benjaminhuth benjaminhuth added Bug Something isn't working Component - Core Affects the Core module Impact - Minor Nuissance bug and/or affects only a single module labels Sep 21, 2022
@benjaminhuth benjaminhuth added this to the next milestone Sep 21, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 21, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #1543 (374e003) into main (e5d1970) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1543   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   48.47%   48.47%           
=======================================
  Files         381      381           
  Lines       20699    20699           
  Branches     9503     9503           
=======================================
  Hits        10034    10034           
  Misses       4112     4112           
  Partials     6553     6553           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...s/SpacePointFormation/detail/SpacePointBuilder.ipp 44.77% <0.00%> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@toyamaza
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @benjaminhuth for fixing this. Looks good to me.

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit f3b20f7 into acts-project:main Sep 23, 2022
@paulgessinger paulgessinger added the backport develop/v19.x Backport this PR to the v19.x series label Sep 23, 2022
acts-project-service pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2022
My new GCC does emit a `-Wmaybe-uninitialized` warning in the `SpacePointBuilder.ipp`. Indeed, in the Error case (the `else` branch in the `buildSpacePoint` function) the values `gpos` and `gCov` seems to stay uninitialized.

I'm not sure if zero initialization is actually the best thing to do here (maybe @toyamaza can comment on that), maybe return a `Result<void>` could  also be an option?

(cherry picked from commit f3b20f7)
paulgessinger pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 23, 2022
…to develop/v19.x] (#1553)

My new GCC does emit a `-Wmaybe-uninitialized` warning in the
`SpacePointBuilder.ipp`. Indeed, in the Error case (the `else` branch in
the `buildSpacePoint` function) the values `gpos` and `gCov` seems to
stay uninitialized.

Co-authored-by: Benjamin Huth <37871400+benjaminhuth@users.noreply.github.com>
@paulgessinger paulgessinger modified the milestones: next, v20.2.0 Sep 23, 2022
@benjaminhuth benjaminhuth deleted the fix/spacepoint-builder-maybe-uninitialized branch February 22, 2023 07:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport develop/v19.x Backport this PR to the v19.x series Bug Something isn't working Component - Core Affects the Core module Impact - Minor Nuissance bug and/or affects only a single module
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants