Tab replacement corrections #132
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
So happy to finally see a Green check!! |
FoamyGuy
approved these changes
Mar 10, 2021
There was a problem hiding this comment.
These changes look good to me. Thank you @jposada202020 for all our work on this fix!
I retested the example code from the original PR successfully with this newest version on:
Adafruit CircuitPython 6.2.0-beta.3-36-g103632f44 on 2021-03-07; Adafruit PyPortal with samd51j20
adafruit-adabot
added a commit
to adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_Bundle
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 10, 2021
Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_Fingerprint to 2.2.0 from 2.1.4: > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_Fingerprint#28 from admiralmaggie/master Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_GPS to 3.8.0 from 3.7.1: > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_GPS#57 from lesamouraipourpre/bad-sentences Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_HT16K33 to 4.1.5 from 4.1.4: > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_HT16K33#86 from SAK917/master Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_IS31FL3731 to 3.0.1 from 3.0.0: > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_IS31FL3731#39 from dglaude/patch-1 Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_MONSTERM4SK to 0.1.2 from 0.1.1: > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_MONSTERM4SK#6 from FoamyGuy/pylintrc_update > Removed pylint process from github workflow Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_AirLift to 1.0.1 from 1.0.0: > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_AirLift#2 from FoamyGuy/pylintrc > Set correct black and reuse versions > Removed pylint process from github workflow > Hardcoded black version Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_Display_Text to 2.15.4 from 2.15.1: > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_Display_Text#132 from jposada202020/tab_replacement > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_Display_Text#130 from kmatch98/master > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_Display_Text#126 from FoamyGuy/label_base_class Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_PIOASM to 0.2.2 from 0.2.1: > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_PIOASM#9 from tannewt/audiobusio_examples > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_PIOASM#13 from FoamyGuy/pylintrc Updating https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_Pixel_Framebuf to 1.1.2 from 1.1.1: > Merge pull request adafruit/Adafruit_CircuitPython_Pixel_Framebuf#4 from FoamyGuy/main > Hardcoded black version
This was referenced Mar 10, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
To replace PR #121. Testing code is the same as used in previous PR
Tested with bitmap_label and label. Similar results as PR #121 showed. Included corrections from @kmatch98 in that PR.
@FoamyGuy as discussed please review.