You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I want to add a c++ library that depends on C++14 features. Upgrading from c++11 to c++14 should take care of that.
Describe alternatives you've considered
I have tested it here locally on a fork and haven't seen any issues (c++14 should be backward compatible with c++11).
Additional context
If you are OK with going ahead, I can make the change here and create a PR. I just want to know if you would approve the update as it could impact other things I may not be aware of. The gcc arm compiler has been supporting this flag for quite a while.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
are you also using gcc 9 as the bsp. If you feel free to submit an PR, however, it may not be merged immediately. There is a quite pending number of issues I would like to resolve first and changing compiler dialect could complicate the issue.
That probably wise. Also, I would probably recommend taking the smaller step of going to 14 first as many people indicate that mostly a "bug fix" of c++11. c++17 brought more things... There are even talks about some gotchas of moving to c++17. https://youtu.be/mAZyaAo3M70
@hathach I just started testing 0.22.1 with my project and quite a few errors are coming out. Some from code that hasn't changed in years. Other places is new with the 0.22.x releases.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I want to add a c++ library that depends on C++14 features. Upgrading from c++11 to c++14 should take care of that.
Describe the solution you'd like
Update the platform.txt file to update the gcc command like flags.
https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_nRF52_Arduino/blob/master/platform.txt#L43
Describe alternatives you've considered
I have tested it here locally on a fork and haven't seen any issues (c++14 should be backward compatible with c++11).
Additional context
If you are OK with going ahead, I can make the change here and create a PR. I just want to know if you would approve the update as it could impact other things I may not be aware of. The gcc arm compiler has been supporting this flag for quite a while.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: