Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add touchio support to the M4. #268

Closed
tannewt opened this issue Sep 19, 2017 · 8 comments · Fixed by #2071
Closed

Add touchio support to the M4. #268

tannewt opened this issue Sep 19, 2017 · 8 comments · Fixed by #2071
Milestone

Comments

@tannewt
Copy link
Member

tannewt commented Sep 19, 2017

No description provided.

@tannewt tannewt added this to the 3.0 milestone Sep 19, 2017
@tannewt tannewt modified the milestones: 3.0, 3.0 Beta Feb 13, 2018
@tannewt tannewt self-assigned this May 2, 2018
@tannewt tannewt modified the milestones: 3.0 Beta, Long term May 22, 2018
@tannewt
Copy link
Member Author

tannewt commented May 22, 2018

We're not going to block 3.0 on this. We'll add support once https://github.com/adafruit/Adafruit_FreeTouch supports it.

@kenidowa
Copy link

kenidowa commented Mar 8, 2019

Will this ever happen?

@ladyada
Copy link
Member

ladyada commented Mar 9, 2019

@kenidowa wanna help? how are you at reverse engineering ARM assembly :)

@siddacious
Copy link

I've been seriously considering giving this a try. I have no idea how successful I'll be but I may or may not have watched your qtouch videos more than a few times and sought out an alternative to IDA.

Good money says I'll fail miserably but maybe I'd at least be able to tell someone more what not to try :)

@ladyada
Copy link
Member

ladyada commented Mar 9, 2019

lol could look at the new free ghidra?

@kenidowa
Copy link

So, I asked about Touchio because I found it really usefully for standalone application of a TrinketMO but when I tried using it on ItsyBitsyMO on larger applications I ran into code space issues. So, moved to ItsyBitsyM4 but then found it doesn't have Touchio. So, after watching 2yr. old video of yours on it. Is it that the SAMD51 touch is so different from SAMD21 or is it the amount of code space it requires in the base that's the problem. Looking at data sheets, it isn't apparent to me that they should be that different.

@ladyada
Copy link
Member

ladyada commented Mar 10, 2019

yep, its completely different

@dhalbert
Copy link
Collaborator

Alternatively, we will do this via #1517, adapting the code in #1499.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants