Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update pin names to match info printed on board #9194

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2024

Conversation

RetiredWizard
Copy link

While the ESP-S3-GEEK and RP2040-GEEK boards are both currently using the Espressif pin naming convention (IOxx), @bablokb pointed out to me that the devices themselves have the pin labels printed on them and they are using the Raspberry Pi RP2040 pin naming convention (GPxx). This PR will update CircuitPython so the pin names match what is printed on the devices.

Only the RP2040-GEEK has been ported to the 9.0.x branch, so I'll submit a second PR to update that branch. @dhalbert Let me know If it would be helpful for me to back port the ESP-S3-GEEK to the 9.0.x branch in that PR as well.

@RetiredWizard
Copy link
Author

@kylefmohr I meant to tag you here....

@kylefmohr
Copy link

@kylefmohr I meant to tag you here....

Good catch by @bablokb - Also your changes LGTM! Thanks @RetiredWizard

Copy link
Collaborator

@dhalbert dhalbert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @RetiredWizard and @bablokb!

I don't think a backport to 9.0.x of ESP32-S3 Geek is needed. If you want to fix 9.0.x RP2040 Geek, that's fine. I won't make a release right away, since it's a minor change.

@dhalbert dhalbert merged commit 33aabb3 into adafruit:main Apr 22, 2024
16 checks passed
@RetiredWizard RetiredWizard deleted the geekpins branch April 24, 2024 03:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants