Make MaterialProperty::polynomial_order a template parameter #262
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Retest this please |
stvdwtt
approved these changes
Mar 12, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently when using a polynomial description of the material properties, we assume that we have a polynomial of order four. This is often not the case and we end up wasting a lot of flops. This PR makes the polynomial order a template parameter. The correct order is computed at runtime by doing a first read of the material parameters before calling
MaterialProperties. The new template parameterp_orderpropagates everywhere because we need to templateMaterialPropertiesand almost every class owns a reference toMaterialProperties.