Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Clarify requirement for eslint.format() #49

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2015
Merged

Clarify requirement for eslint.format() #49

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2015

Conversation

Kingdutch
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #46

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 76.52% when pulling 81749c0 on Kingdutch:patch-1 into bc6d4b7 on adametry:master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 76.52% when pulling 81749c0 on Kingdutch:patch-1 into bc6d4b7 on adametry:master.

adametry added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2015
@adametry
Merge pull request #49 from Kingdutch/patch-1
d3807ea 
Clarify requirement for eslint.format()
@adametry adametry merged commit d3807ea into adametry:master Mar 31, 2015
@adametry
Copy link
Owner

Looks good. The feedback and PR are appreciated.

@Kingdutch Kingdutch deleted the patch-1 branch April 1, 2015 10:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Reflect in README.md: .formatEach() or.format() are needed for output.
3 participants
@Kingdutch @coveralls @adametry