XGBoost Flower simulation #2668
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
danieljanes
previously approved these changes
Dec 7, 2023
added 2 commits
December 7, 2023 13:54
…flower into xgb-flwr-sim-comprehensive
jafermarq
reviewed
Dec 7, 2023
jafermarq
previously approved these changes
Jan 23, 2024
danieljanes
approved these changes
Feb 1, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue
Description
Using Flower simulation is an easy way to simulate large-scale XGBoost experiments. However, the current XGBoost implementation does not support this.
Related issues/PRs
This PR is created on the top of this PR (non-stateful client).
Proposal
sim.pyto do Flower simulation.utils.py.utils.py.