Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: !artefact command #21

Open
robaxelsen opened this issue May 5, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

Feature request: !artefact command #21

robaxelsen opened this issue May 5, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@robaxelsen
Copy link
Contributor

robaxelsen commented May 5, 2017

Would love to have a feature where we can query a db/data of artefacts, and get returned name, category, description and cost.

I will gladly help implement this, but I need help to get enough Go and ada-bot/DiscordGo/SQL knowledge to get started.

@robaxelsen
Copy link
Contributor Author

robaxelsen commented May 5, 2017

Example usage:
!artefact tfang

Name: Thoth's Fang
Category: Offensive Artefacts
Description: 23% faster DSTABs
Cost: 1600 credits

robaxelsen added a commit to robaxelsen/ada-bot that referenced this issue Jun 5, 2017
Requested this myself in an issue, and decided to contribute. New
command that queries a local .json file with manually compiled
artefact data, and serves the corresponding artefact information.
Includes following behavior/options:
 1. The user can query both with full artefact name and keywords
 2. If the keyword exists for several artfacts, the bot asks the
    user to try again with full artefact name

This closes adayoung#21.
robaxelsen added a commit to robaxelsen/ada-bot that referenced this issue Jun 5, 2017
Requested this myself in an issue, and decided to contribute. New
command that queries a local .json file with manually compiled
artefact data, and serves the corresponding artefact information.
Includes following behavior/options:
 1. The user can query both with full artefact name and keywords
 2. If the keyword exists for several artfacts, the bot asks the
    user to try again with full artefact name

This closes adayoung#21.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants