Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Any planned changes to 廷 in CN? #327

Open
NightFurySL2001 opened this issue Feb 4, 2022 · 6 comments
Open

Any planned changes to 廷 in CN? #327

NightFurySL2001 opened this issue Feb 4, 2022 · 6 comments

Comments

@NightFurySL2001
Copy link

In adobe-fonts/source-han-serif#39, the 廷 component for CN is changed to 壬 (middle horizontal stroke longest), while TW/HK uses the old 𡈼 (bottom horizontal stroke longest).

image

The current main Sans form in CN using 𡈼 (bottom horizontal stroke longest) is the form presented in Unicode code charts G source, but the current main Serif form in CN using 壬 (middle horizontal stroke longest) is the form presented in 通用规范汉字表. Will there be changes to Sans or this can be seen as a unifiable variation in Sans font? (both might be acceptable for CN)

@NightFurySL2001
Copy link
Author

P/S: 𪊶 for TW seems to be wrong too.
image

@zhenlige
Copy link

No need. There are no files that say the middle of 廷 in CN must be 壬, and the change will introduce a lot more CIDs.

@NightFurySL2001
Copy link
Author

@zhenlige This is the form specified in 《通用规范汉字表》(2013).
image
image
image

If this is not to be considered, then issue #300 should be addressed too as 辶 is not specified in any document. Hell, even 人 on top should be unified to JP form too. (see below)
image

@zhenlige
Copy link

zhenlige commented Apr 8, 2022

@zhenlige This is the form specified in 《通用规范汉字表》(2013). image image image

If this is not to be considered, then issue #300 should be addressed too as 辶 is not specified in any document. Hell, even 人 on top should be unified to JP form too. (see below) image

I also think the differences listed above should unify.

@hfhchan
Copy link

hfhchan commented Apr 9, 2022

The GB/T 2312 and GB 18030 are character set standards, not glyph standards. The Table of General Standard Chinese Characters however specifies the normative glyph shape.

The stroke length is typically not seen as a stylistic issue, unlike the stroke shapes and connection points.

@NightFurySL2001
Copy link
Author

Update: the newest GB18030-2022 has changed the form of 廷 series to use the glyph with middle stroke longer.
image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants