[FFI/Jtreg]Exclude VaListTest in JDK20 #4489
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Reviewer: @llxia |
|
@ChengJin01 Is this a permanent exclusion? If so, please add a comment in #1297 and update PR to reference #1297. Thanks |
The change exclude this test suite as we no longer need VaList as specified in the latest JEP442 at eclipse-openj9/openj9#16951 Fixes: eclipse-openj9/openj9/issues/17091 Signed-off-by: ChengJin01 <jincheng@ca.ibm.com>
ChengJin01
force-pushed
the
exclude_ffi_jtreg_valist_jdk20
branch
from
578bb08
to
b763053
Compare
Updated as suggested above (as there is no plan for OpenJDK to restore them back in the near future). |
karianna
approved these changes
Apr 4, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The change exclude this test suite as we no longer need VaList
as specified in the latest JEP442 at
eclipse-openj9/openj9#16951
Fixes: eclipse-openj9/openj9/issues/17091
Signed-off-by: ChengJin01 jincheng@ca.ibm.com