Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure SUT's variable name is logged #87

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 25, 2022

Conversation

adrianiftode
Copy link
Owner

Instead of showing 'Expected response to have'
it was shown 'Expected value to have'
when the assertion was like response.Should().XXX

  • inline all ExecuteAssert private methods
  • change from {context:value} to {context:response}
  • add CustomAssertion attribute

@adrianiftode adrianiftode force-pushed the fixes-ensure-SUT-variable-name-is-logged branch 2 times, most recently from cb81e80 to ddfc2f5 Compare March 25, 2022 21:53
Instead of showing 'Expected response to have'
it was shown 'Expected value to have'
when the assertion was like response.Should().XXX

inline all ExecuteAssert private methods
change from {context:value} to {context:response}
add CustomAssertion attribute
@adrianiftode adrianiftode force-pushed the fixes-ensure-SUT-variable-name-is-logged branch from ddfc2f5 to 58822f6 Compare March 25, 2022 22:00
@adrianiftode adrianiftode merged commit 2487b26 into master Mar 25, 2022
@adrianiftode adrianiftode deleted the fixes-ensure-SUT-variable-name-is-logged branch March 25, 2022 22:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant