Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Enhancement]: Possibility to just get chapter titles without overwriting timestamps. #991

Closed
garlik82 opened this issue Sep 17, 2022 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@garlik82
Copy link

Describe the feature/enhancement

Hi.

When merging mp3 files with m4b-tool, we get the a chapter.txt with the correct timestamps for the chapters, (assuming every file merged corresponds to a book chapter). I would like to be able to use lookup in chapter editor to just get the chapter titles.

Thanks.

@garlik82 garlik82 added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 17, 2022
@advplyr
Copy link
Owner

advplyr commented Sep 17, 2022

If the timestamps don't match up then how do you know the chapter titles will be correct?
I'm not sure what this would look like in the UI

@garlik82
Copy link
Author

garlik82 commented Sep 17, 2022

Would have to listen to the chapter to be sure.
Maybe, manually matching the lookup chapters to our file chapters. I would listen to the chapter using the preview button in chapter editor and pick what chapter it corresponds in the lookup generated file.
Sorry for my English.

EDIT:
Adding a manual matching button, clicking the button would open a lookup window and we would be able to select which lookup chapter it corresponds to.
Captura de ecrã 2022-09-17, às 14 58 24

EDIT2:
An easier way would be to let us download the output of the lookup to a txt file, so we could copy and paste the chapter names.

@garlik82
Copy link
Author

Uhuh. Thanks :)

@advplyr
Copy link
Owner

advplyr commented Oct 2, 2022

Added in v2.2.0

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants