Add coverage run section for Coveralls

[adybbroe]

Signed-off-by: Adam.Dybbroe a000680@c21856.ad.smhi.se

• Closes #xxxx
• Tests added
• Tests passed: Passes pytest pyspectral
• Passes flake8
• Fully documented

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #5 (75e5722) into main (b8cbcf3) will increase coverage by 6.56%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main       #5      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   62.16%   68.73%   +6.56%     
==========================================
  Files           9       11       +2     
  Lines        1044     1324     +280     
  Branches       92      144      +52     
==========================================
+ Hits          649      910     +261     
- Misses        378      392      +14     
- Partials       17       22       +5     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	68.73% <ø> (+6.56%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
activefires_pp/tests/test_messaging.py	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
activefires_pp/tests/test_fires_filtering.py	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
activefires_pp/geometries_from_shapefiles.py	85.71% <0.00%> (ø)
activefires_pp/tests/test_shapefile_geometries.py	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
activefires_pp/post_processing.py	61.77% <0.00%> (+8.71%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b8cbcf3...75e5722. Read the comment docs.

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 0.0% when pulling 7ae0e38 on fix4coveralls into 79d45c0 on main.