This repository has been archived by the owner on May 26, 2023. It is now read-only.
Specific YCQL and YEDIS (and YSQL) proxy port binding flags #153
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Continues to evaluate some of the findings from the
webserver_interface
binding from this issue #53 (comment), except extending it to ycql and yedisthere seems to be solid benefit to just explicitly declaring the binding addresses for each of these proxy endpoints, rather than relying on
0.0.0.0
or perhaps an auto-parsing routine, so they will be explicitly declared based on the findings from these:fun facts:
sample-apps
, etc., in order to consume the port bindings through direct bosh linksaddresses #80
closes #81
I'm also go to see if I can freely tack on
ysql
, even though it's not in use... It's interesting since the yugabyte helm chart appears to use the pod ip: https://github.com/yugabyte/charts/blob/master/stable/yugabyte/templates/service.yaml#L287