Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Train NeuFace on captured multi-view images but do not use ImFace prior #10

Closed
07hyx06 opened this issue Oct 17, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Comments

@07hyx06
Copy link

07hyx06 commented Oct 17, 2023

Hi, thanks for your great work and code!

I try to run NeuFace on a multi-view face image dataset capture by myself. It contains multi-view images of a single identity.

By reading through the issues, I find that its not very easy to follow the "Train on FaceScape" pipeline. It seems that a lot of processing task should be done, including align the mesh to the ImFace coordinates, crop the face mesh, etc. So I want to follow the "Train on DTU" pipeline.

My question is that, have you tried to train NeuFace on the same identity from the FaceScape dataset, with and without the ImFace prior (in my understanding "Train on FaceScape" is the one with prior while "Train on DTU" is the one without prior)? If without the ImFace prior, can we obtain plausible relightable face reconstruction results? What about the performance drop compared to the one with prior?

Thanks.

@aejion
Copy link
Owner

aejion commented Oct 17, 2023

Thanks for your attention!
In our experiments, training NeuFace on a face dataset using the "Train on DTU" process can obtain plausible reconstruction results. However, there may be a degradation in performance in terms of appearance and geometry. Additionally, you can also relight the reconstructed results (if your self-captured dataset has the same camera settings, you may try deleting the calibration module for improved relighting results).

@07hyx06
Copy link
Author

07hyx06 commented Oct 17, 2023

Got it. Thanks for your quick reply!

@07hyx06 07hyx06 closed this as completed Oct 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants