Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IDE: resolve OSGi configs (Standard) #84

Closed
2 tasks done
deeprim opened this issue May 13, 2017 · 1 comment · Fixed by #191
Closed
2 tasks done

IDE: resolve OSGi configs (Standard) #84

deeprim opened this issue May 13, 2017 · 1 comment · Fixed by #191

Comments

@deeprim
Copy link
Collaborator

deeprim commented May 13, 2017

Resolve OSGi configs for services declared with OSGi R6 annotations

  • Added reference between class with R6 annotation with OSGI config
  • Added reference between R6 service config properties and OSGI config values
@deeprim deeprim created this issue from a note in Common (Proposed) May 13, 2017
@deeprim deeprim moved this from Proposed to Ready for development in Common Jun 1, 2017
@deeprim deeprim added this to the v0.9 milestone Aug 6, 2017
@deeprim deeprim modified the milestones: v0.9, v1.0 Nov 19, 2017
@koha26 koha26 modified the milestones: v1.0, v0.9.2 Apr 14, 2022
@koha26 koha26 moved this from Ready for development to In progress in Common Apr 14, 2022
@koha26 koha26 self-assigned this Apr 14, 2022
@koha26 koha26 linked a pull request Apr 17, 2022 that will close this issue
koha26 added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 18, 2022
deeprim added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 19, 2022
@koha26 koha26 moved this from In progress to Done in Common Apr 19, 2022
@koha26
Copy link
Collaborator

koha26 commented Apr 24, 2022

Will be included in 0.9.2.

@koha26 koha26 closed this as completed Apr 24, 2022
@koha26 koha26 moved this from Done to Archive in Common Jul 1, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Common
Archive
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants