New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ENH] Update erp distance #333
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This reverts commit 2d69ca4.
chrisholder
commented
May 4, 2023
TonyBagnall
approved these changes
May 4, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
distances
Distances package
enhancement
New feature, improvement request or other non-bug code enhancement
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reference Issues/PRs
This pr depends on pr #332
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
This pr updates erp to the new format for distances. In addition in doing so it makes optimisations for computing the distances between multiple time series.
In addition, this pr updates the 'g' parameter allowing a array to be passed that allows for a different value of g per channel (the suggested way in the original paper to set g is the standard deviation of each channel for each channel).
Does your contribution introduce a new dependency? If yes, which one?
What should a reviewer concentrate their feedback on?
Did you add any tests for the change?
Any other comments?
PR checklist
For all contributions