Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 17, 2023. It is now read-only.

Data sync proposal #227

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Jan 10, 2014
Merged

Data sync proposal #227

merged 6 commits into from Jan 10, 2014

Conversation

abstractj
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@danielpassos
Copy link
Collaborator

+9001

@danbev
Copy link
Contributor

danbev commented Jan 8, 2014

👍

1 similar comment
@matzew
Copy link
Contributor

matzew commented Jan 8, 2014

👍


**revision** (long):

This is the client's idea of what a known good sync will look like. If, post merge, the server's checksum and client's check sum do not match then the client is out of sync and must resync and handle the conflict.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So a revision is a checksum?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@secondsun So let's put back the checksum? I can revert it if necessary

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds good

@abstractj
Copy link
Contributor Author

@secondsun the latest commit was reverted, lemme know if you have something else.

@matzew matzew merged commit ccb42c8 into aerogear:data-sync Jan 10, 2014
@matzew
Copy link
Contributor

matzew commented Jan 10, 2014

Thanks - landed on the branch, in 3af765f

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants