Winning funding and peer reviewer disagreement

Code and data for our analysis of American Institute of Biological Sciences (AIBS) grant applications. Paper title: "Do funding applications where peer reviewers disagree have higher citations?"

The four files are:

1. AIBS.RData, R data file with the following variables:

• "Anon_PropID" - Application ID number
• "Review Year" - Year application was reviewed
• "Web TRC" - Total relative citations (primary outcome)
• "score.mean" - Mean of peer reviewers' scores
• "score.sd" - Standard deviance of peer reviewers' scores
• "Min Score" - Minimum of peer reviewers' scores
• "Max Score" - Maximum of peer reviewers' scores
• "range" - Range of peer reviewers' scores
• "N Votes" - Number of peer reviewers
• "Panel" - Panel ID

2. AIBS.csv, csv data with same rows and variables as AIBS.RData.

3. grant.outcomes.github.Rmd, Rmarkdown file to perform the analyses using AIBS.RData. Was created using R version 3.4.4. The following R packages need to be installed:

• doBy
• dplyr
• ellipse
• ggplot2
• influence.ME
• lme4
• merTools
• mice
• mitools
• pander
• plyr
• reshape2
• stargazer

4. grant.outcomes.github.docx, Word output from the Rmarkdown file.