You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
parserProblems with the parser's implementation (rather than with decisions about syntax)syntaxBike-shedding of the surface syntaxtype: bugIssues and pull requests about actual bugs
postulate
F : (Set → Set) → Set
!_ : Set → Set
!_,_ : Set → Set → Set
X : Set
syntax F (λ X → A) = X , A
infix 1 F
infix 2 !_
Foo : Set
Foo = ! X , X
-- This expression can be parsed in exactly one way. However, Agda
-- rejects it:
--
-- Expected variable name in binding position
--
-- The error is thrown from pure code in rebuildBinding, and this
-- action circumvents the parser logic.
--
-- The error was introduced in the fix for Issue 1129, and the problem
-- raised in Issue 1129 was introduced in a fix for Issue 1108
-- ("Operator parser performance").
Original issue reported on code.google.com by nils.anders.danielsson on 4 Mar 2015 at 1:55
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
parserProblems with the parser's implementation (rather than with decisions about syntax)syntaxBike-shedding of the surface syntaxtype: bugIssues and pull requests about actual bugs
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
nils.anders.danielsson
on 4 Mar 2015 at 1:55The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: