Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

stack overflow #29

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Aug 8, 2015 · 8 comments
Closed

stack overflow #29

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Aug 8, 2015 · 8 comments
Labels
type: bug Issues and pull requests about actual bugs

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

The last definition in this file (composition of natural transformations) 
causes command line agda to 
stack overflow

Original issue reported on code.google.com by jmchap...@gmail.com on 29 Nov 2007 at 10:42

Attachments:

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

P.S. It worked ok yesterday!

Original comment by jmchap...@gmail.com on 29 Nov 2007 at 11:28

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Probable cause: The termination checker can now see dotted patterns, which 
means that
it has more work to do than before.

Original comment by ulf.nor...@gmail.com on 30 Nov 2007 at 10:41

  • Changed state: Accepted
  • Added labels: Priority-Low
  • Removed labels: Priority-Medium

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

it still stack overflows with the termination checker turned off

Original comment by jmchap...@gmail.com on 30 Nov 2007 at 11:21

@GoogleCodeExporter GoogleCodeExporter added type: bug Issues and pull requests about actual bugs auto-migrated labels Aug 8, 2015
@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by ulf.nor...@gmail.com on 30 Nov 2007 at 11:28

  • Added labels: Priority-High
  • Removed labels: Priority-Low

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

I can't reproduce the problem. Yes, I get stack overflow, but I get that with 
the
version of Agda from Nov 20 as well. Increasing the stack size to 20 meg makes 
it go
through (+RTS -K20M). Looking at the profiling info they both take up roughly 
the
same amount of resources.

Original comment by ulf.nor...@gmail.com on 7 Dec 2007 at 11:46

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Make that 25 megs of stack.

Original comment by ulf.nor...@gmail.com on 7 Dec 2007 at 11:53

  • Changed state: InfoNeeded

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

I've just tried some older versions and now I can't reproduce it either. Sorry 
to have wasted your time. I think I 
probably thought I'd tried it in batch mode but actually I hadn't. Thanks for 
the tip about increasing the stack.

Original comment by jmchap...@gmail.com on 7 Dec 2007 at 2:38

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Original comment by ulf.nor...@gmail.com on 7 Dec 2007 at 2:42

  • Changed state: Invalid

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: bug Issues and pull requests about actual bugs
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants