Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Made --cubical-compatible less coinfective #6221

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 24, 2022
Merged

Made --cubical-compatible less coinfective #6221

merged 5 commits into from
Oct 24, 2022

Conversation

nad
Copy link
Contributor

@nad nad commented Oct 23, 2022

The option --cubical-compatible was made less coinfective, see issue #6220.

The pull request also includes some changes to other pieces of documentation in the section "Consistency checking of options used".

@nad nad self-assigned this Oct 23, 2022
@nad nad linked an issue Oct 23, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
@nad nad force-pushed the issue6220 branch 2 times, most recently from 341ac98 to 784fdf9 Compare October 24, 2022 14:37
The new type InfectiveCoinfectiveOption can represent both infective
and coinfective options.
And replaced one plain string with a linked piece of text.
And replaced --no-syntactic-equality with --syntactic-equality.
@andreasabel andreasabel added ux: options Issues relating to Agda's command line options cubical Cubical Agda paraphernalia: Paths, Glue, partial elements, hcomp, transp labels Oct 24, 2022
@andreasabel andreasabel added this to the 2.6.3 milestone Oct 24, 2022
@andreasabel andreasabel mentioned this pull request Oct 24, 2022
@nad nad merged commit 04e34f9 into master Oct 24, 2022
@nad nad deleted the issue6220 branch October 24, 2022 17:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cubical Cubical Agda paraphernalia: Paths, Glue, partial elements, hcomp, transp ux: options Issues relating to Agda's command line options
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Should README modules still be supported?
2 participants