-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 134
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RP2 #847
RP2 #847
Conversation
The index and the groups were at the same level. The should be at different one, for instance if the index is Nat, and the group something else
-> Modify some notions in gradedCommutativity -> new lemme for the "good" -h^ -> proof
-> Because this case is so degenerated, things compute. This new proof is forgetting some of the computation to have proof that will rise better to non-degenerated case
-> changing gradedComm by gradedCom' to account the previuous change
-> There is a need of the special as on the left we need the CommRing to take A / < a, ..., b > and we nedd a ring on the right as H*(X) is not a CommRing but a gradedComm Ring
-> A cleaner way to deal with the cup product -> Finish all the structure except some cases of the cup-product -> Prove the retraction property
@aljungstrom I miss H4 RP2 to do my proof |
@mortberg
About working with the Z/k, I think this prove it stills works up to a few tricks. |
@mortberg Finally done with that ! |
Add RP2, in progress