Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Raster app changes #26

Closed
12 tasks done
rkelson opened this issue Jan 9, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed
12 tasks done

Raster app changes #26

rkelson opened this issue Jan 9, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@rkelson
Copy link
Member

rkelson commented Jan 9, 2018

  • I renamed INDICES.DEM_Extents to INDICES.USGS_DEM_Extents
  • There is a new extent we need to incorporate INDICES.AutoCorrelated_DEM_Extents
    • let me know when this is incorporated so I can remove the records from INDICES.USGS_DEM_Extents

The new categories for raster should be:

  • Aerial Photography
  • LiDAR DEMs
  • USGS DEMs
  • Auto-Correlated DEMs
  • Contours
  • USGS Topo Maps

Lidar_Extents has a field FTP_Path that shows up in the More Info panel. This field is used for project based metadata download links.

Futures

  • It would be cool if each had an alt tag / title text (steve suggested the acronym tag) to explain what they are

  • I changed my mind about adding the new scanned extents to the current Aerial Photography extents; it would return too many results. I propose making a new category named something like Historical Scanned Aerial Photography.

stdavis added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 9, 2018
@stdavis
Copy link
Member

stdavis commented Jan 9, 2018

I got #1 done and pushed to production. I tested running the pallet manually this afternoon to verify.

@stdavis stdavis self-assigned this Mar 8, 2018
stdavis added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 8, 2018
stdavis added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 8, 2018
@stdavis
Copy link
Member

stdavis commented Mar 8, 2018

Hey @rkelson: I've got the checked off items pushed to http://test.mapserv.utah.gov/raster. Would you mind taking a look and letting me know what needs to be fixed or if we are good to push to production?

I've also created separate issues for the items under "Futures". They are #27 & #28 respectively.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants