We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
At present the industry definitions of a "getter" and a "setter" are broader than they were in the olden Java Bean days:
// classic "java bean" public T getXyz() {} // classic "java bean" boolean public boolean isXyz() {} // an implicit "getter" in a Java Record public T xyz() {}
// classic "java bean" setter public void setXyz(T t) {} // fluent setter public This setXyz(T t) {}
Our property compiler should respect all flavors, not just the classic ones.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Expand the definition of "getter" and "setter" #618
cf6b0a3
No branches or pull requests
At present the industry definitions of a "getter" and a "setter" are broader than they were in the olden Java Bean days:
Our property compiler should respect all flavors, not just the classic ones.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: