Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Are the ORFs conserved? #7

Closed
Juke34 opened this issue Jun 26, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Are the ORFs conserved? #7

Juke34 opened this issue Jun 26, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@Juke34
Copy link

Juke34 commented Jun 26, 2020

It is not clear in the paper on biorxiv is the ORFs are conserved, could you tell me? I mean if the tool check when lifting protein coding genes that the lifted CDS still shape an ORF still intact.

@agshumate
Copy link
Owner

Hi, liftoff does not check this , but you can use gffread (https://github.com/gpertea/gffread) with the -P option on the output file to identify CDS's that are truncated or have an inframe stop codon

@Juke34
Copy link
Author

Juke34 commented Jul 3, 2020

I was wondering if the tool could be classified as gene predictor based on transcript Projection like Projector, AIR, transMap or CESAR. So now I know.
Thank you for your answer.

For me the use of the term of 'annotation' is often misleading in publications. It can be used in different ways. As genome annotation expert for me Annotation underlies the creation of gene models by identifying the gene structure. In your case the gene models might be broken during the liftover. So it is why I needed to clarify this point. This is something that would be nice to clarify early in your paper.

Best regards

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants